🐵 ATOMIC APES · FAIR-LAUNCH DESIGN · IN PREPARATION
Atomic Apes
Coming soon — not live yet. A planned 10,000-supply collection for Robinhood Chain. The launch is being redesigned around open registration, reviewed eligibility, cohort allocation, reserved claim windows, and delayed reveal—not a gas race. Holder pricing and specimen-related utility are planned; no free airdrop or guaranteed specimen claim is promised.
Registration → allocation → reserved claim
Free wallet-signature registration, accessible anti-automation checks, reviewed uniqueness signals, and an appeal path. Registration speed and gas spending do not improve allocation.
Proposed split: 60% newcomer applicants and 40% qualifying RIG-holder applicants. One first allocation per selected participant, then at most one additional allocation if supply remains.
Selected wallets claim reserved allocations without competing on mint order. Unclaimed reservations roll into a published follow-up round.
STEP 1 — REGISTER (FREE)
Get on the Atomic Apes whitelist.
Registration is a 0-ETH transaction to the GoodsMash treasury carrying an onchain marker — costs dust, is publicly verifiable, and cannot be faked after the fact. Holders are recognized with the $5 holder price at claim time; everyone else pays public price. Registration speed does NOT matter — allocation is by review, not a race.
Connect your wallet to register.
Fair-launch rules: registration is free and open for days, not a gas race. Allocation is reviewed and frozen before claims open. Holder price recognition — not speed — is what holders get. Screening uses public signals with an appeal path; no "bot-proof" claims, ever.
0 registered
Built from APER1-marker transactions to the GoodsMash treasury — every registration is a real onchain tx anyone can audit on Blockscout. Holder snapshots (direct + staked RIGS) are taken at scan time for the allocation review. Scan: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 03:17:14 GMT.
What you get for holding an Ape
- 🪨 UV-Fluorescent specimen tier — access to specimens tagged with the APE exclusive metadata onchain
- 📦 Priority specimen access — holder priority for converted certificates and mission drops, subject to inventory, verification, safety, and published terms
- 🌍 International digital access — international holders can receive onchain certificate access where physical shipping is restricted; physical redemption is handled separately
- 🎯 Specimen mint whitelist — 30-min early access to all new specimen NFTs before public
- 🛠️ Atomic materials fund — planned use includes Geiger equipment and α/β/γ measurement upgrades, PPE and shielding, specimen handling, rare-earth/mineral fieldwork, legal/export review, shipping, and future international expeditions
Not a JPEG. A path from a rock in the ground to a title deed.
These are the real stops, in order. Each one is something that either exists today or is explicitly funded by an open mission — nothing here is a promise of a prize. Where a step is not live yet, it says so.
- Register — a gasless 0-ETH marker tx. No payment, no allocation. (open now)
- Reviewed allocation → reserved claim — allowances are reviewed, then claimed in a window. Holder $5 / public $10. Delayed reveal, not a gas race. (not live — art + contracts pending)
- Hold the Ape — this is what unlocks the specimen side: holder priority on new certificates, a 30-minute early window on specimen mints, and international digital access where physical shipping is restricted.
- Missions find the material — past digs came back with smoky quartz, beryl-family pieces and mica. Mission 02 is open now and specifically targets UV-fluorescent material on night sessions; that is the material the radioactive tier is built on. See the missions →
- Each piece is weighed, photographed, measured, certified — one cert per physical piece, onchain. Measured numbers only; a piece with no reading stays off sale.
- Claim it, or have it shipped — the certificate is the title deed. US holders can request the physical piece; UV-fluorescent pieces are held until Geiger readings and shielding are in place. Redemption →
Honest scope: an Ape is access and priority — not a guaranteed specimen, not a floor, not a yield. The radioactive tier is real intent backed by a funded mission and a measurement discipline, not a claim that any piece is safe, salable, or available. Nothing is promised beyond what is on the live board.
APE NFT ≠ future APE token
The Atomic Ape is an ERC-721 collector/access asset. Any future Atomic token or liquidity pool would be a separate, independently disclosed product. A token would not represent ownership of minerals, land, mining output, or company equity.
- Test and verify the NFT contract with Ledger ownership.
- Publish final terms, supply, price, eligibility, and metadata before sale.
- If a separate token is ever approved, launch it through a documented curve/market route with verified quote math.
- Only graduate liquidity after transparent thresholds and a permanent or time-locked LP policy are independently verified.
- Keep specimen certificates and physical redemption records separate from token liquidity.
No viral outcome, floor, liquidity depth, or future value is promised. Participation always requires the user to review and sign their own transaction.
Planned use of proceeds
This is a planning model, not a live accounting statement. Final terms will be published before a sale.
Marketplace launch checklist
The full collection is being prepared for OpenSea with:
- 10,000 metadata entries (placeholder traits pre-mint, revealed in batches)
- Honest description (no RWA stocks, no mining claims, no fund splits, just real specimens + onchain utility)
- Trait scheme: background, fur, eyes, accessory, era — atomic theme
- Screening criteria, review evidence, appeal deadline, and privileged changes are disclosed before allocation
- International shipping friendly (NFT is global, value is global)
The marketplace listing goes live only after the contract is deployed, verified, and the metadata/royalty settings are checked.
Fairness controls, not a humanity guarantee
- Wallet signatures authenticate control of a wallet, not a unique human
- RIG eligibility uses a published historical snapshot, including qualifying staked RIGs
- Registration signals support review but are not automatic proof of bot activity
- Smart-wallet-compatible validation is required; no
tx.originhumanity test - Allocation claims are recipient-bound, cumulative, replay-protected, chain/contract/round scoped, and expiring
- Artwork assignment is delayed until claims close; no visible token-ID rarity sniping
This design reduces the advantage of speed, gas spending, and wallet multiplication; it cannot prove that every participant is a unique human.
Contract (TESTNET first, then MAINNET)
Testnet 46630: pending deploy · Mainnet 4663: pending deploy
Owner: Ledger 0x9111 (NOT dev 0x2f55) — so APE is safe even if dev goes cold.
PLANNED — mechanism designed, contract not deployed
These three programs are designed and written down so they can be reviewed before anything is promised. None of them is live. Each entry states what would have to be true before it activates.
Partner project whitelist — reserved band for other Robinhood Chain holders
A reserved allocation band set aside for holders of other Robinhood Chain collections, ranked by real 7-day trading volume rather than by who asked first.
Rule: Top projects by 7-day volume get a reserved allocation at the holder price, one allocation per qualifying wallet. The band is capped so it cannot crowd out individual registrants.
Why volume and not followers: Follower counts and Discord size are bought. Volume is onchain and checkable, so it is the only ranking we can publish and let anyone verify.
Largest reserved band · Holder of the partner collection at the allocation snapshot block
Proof: Balance check at a published block height
Smaller reserved band · Holder of the partner collection at the allocation snapshot block
Proof: Balance check at a published block height
The remainder of supply · Any wallet that registered during the registration window
Proof: Registration marker transaction
How a partner is verified: For each partner project: read the collection's onchain transfer volume over the trailing 7 days and the current holder count, record the block range used, and publish it. A project that cannot be read onchain is not included.
- Nobody is guaranteed an allocation by holding a partner collection — the band is capped and oversubscribed bands are resolved by the published rule, not by speed.
- Partner holders do not get a better price than GoodsMash holders.
- A partner project appearing here says nothing about that project's quality or safety, and implies no endorsement in either direction.
Status: Awaiting the final list. The tier structure and the verification method are ready; the project names are supplied by the team, not invented here.
Big-find vote — the funders decide what happens to an exceptional piece
When a funded mission comes back with material that is genuinely exceptional, the decision about what to do with the best single piece is put to the people who paid for the trip.
Why: The alternative is one person deciding alone what a once-in-a-decade piece is worth and where it goes. A vote is slower and more honest, and it stops the best find from quietly disappearing.
Who votes: Wallets that funded that specific mission, weighted by the entry weight already published on the mission page. RIG holders and dollar contributors carry the weight their entry earned — not a flat one-wallet-one-vote.
What gets put to a vote:
- Ship the piece to the highest funder directly, as part of their tier perk
- Mint it as a single 1-of-1 certificate and sell it, splitting proceeds by the published rule
- Place it in the long-term hold, with the intent of museum or institutional placement
- Cut or prepare it to realise more value, if a qualified person advises that is the right call
- What counts as a big find: The trigger has not been set to a number yet. It has to be a value or rarity threshold published BEFORE the mission leaves, so that the trigger cannot be chosen after the fact to suit an outcome.
- Quorum: Not set. Must be published before any vote is held.
- Binding or advisory: Not yet decided whether the vote binds or advises — this must be settled and published before a vote is used for anything.
Nothing here has been voted on. There is no mechanism onchain for this yet, and no trigger has been agreed. Publishing the shape of the decision now is the point: the rules have to exist before the situation does, or they get written to fit whatever was found.
Specimen royalty split — a share of what a mission specimen earns, back to who funded the trip
A share of what a funded-mission specimen earns when it is sold or resold, paid back to the wallet that funded the trip and to whoever held the certificate.
- Mechanism: The certificate contract already carries an EIP-2981 royalty. That is the mechanism a resale split would ride on, rather than a new unilateral deduction.
- Funder share: A portion of the royalty routed back to the funding wallets for the mission that produced the piece, weighted by entry weight.
- Holder share: The remainder to the certificate holder, who carries the custody and the risk.
- Treasury share: A portion to the treasury, which is what funds the next mission.
The hard part, stated plainly: Royalty enforcement is not automatic on every marketplace. A creator royalty is a request that compliant marketplaces honour, not something the contract can force a non-compliant venue to pay. Any split described as guaranteed would be false.
Status: BUILT / NOT DEPLOYED — the certificate contract supports the royalty hook; the split-router contract that would pay the funder share does not exist yet.
What has to be true first:
- A split-router contract deployed and verified, with the percentages fixed at deploy time and not owner-adjustable
- A published, immutable mapping from mission to funding wallets
- A plain statement that marketplace compliance varies, so the split applies wherever royalties are honoured and cannot be promised where they are not
Planned allocations may support Geiger and radiation-safety upgrades, rare-earth and mineral missions, specimen processing, shipping, legal/customs work, and international field operations. These are treasury plans—not a claim that each mint buys a specific mineral or that the NFT is backed by reserves.